Friday, April 29, 2005

apologetics I

why am i so anal about the minor discomforts of life?

i'd like to propose 2 general reactions to experience minor discomforts in everyday life: the accepting approach and the rejecting approach. by minor discomforts i refer to stuff like lousy weather, crappy rules, poorly designed structures - disappointing encounters which may or may not be typically ignored. generally non-life-threatening pecularities that could otherwise be rather easily improved upon (in my opinion).

accepting approach - "why bother complaining?" "it's not that bad, just tolerate lor." "that's normal what." "don't be so anal lar." "get over it. move on." this approach has various merits. its adopters need not spend any time or effort troubling themselves with whatever's "not really wrong anyway." purporters may appear "cool" and "unaffected," perhaps choosing to ignore what may be off their list of priorities. hence, such persons may also appear prioritised and wise.

rejecting approach - "why is this not fixed?" "it's such a simple detail - and they can't get it right." "so screwed up." "why don't you care?" "i can't believe i'm paying taxes for this." this approach seems unpopular. fierce advocates tend to be social critics with no social life - spending too much time trying to fix (or suggest strategies to improve )what may not even be broken. everything seems to be against them, and they appear stressed out over the most anal of things.

so why do i tend to take the latter approach more? there is a crucial variable that i omitted on purpose: knowledge. what if i choose the second approach based on knowledge? that i simply know something to be wrong whereas others simply do not know it? may seem a wimpish excuse to most who adopt the first approach, or may even seem like an insulting retort. but the next time i am anal about something, perhaps it isn't that i am taking the rejecting approach for the aim of being anal, but for the sake of improvements that acceptors can't be bothered with.

maybe i am not anal, just observant!

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

teresa*:

hello there... who the hell dare say you're anal? *punch* *bpx* *kick* cmon...i agree, you're observant!

hope the hols have started for you, if not its sooner or later la!

Anonymous said...

"I think too much, therefore I am too much"

The author of that quote was Tim Quigley from a poem he published back in 1994. If you are going to use that quote, please update your web pages presenting it with his credit.

Thank you.

alveolate said...

never read the poem.

i just happened to think of it... call it spontaneous innovation.

btw i don't claim authorship to anything. just crappy verses that come to me.